When the conversion process ended the system went back to normal and everything was fine, but in the future, I will probably not do a large conversion like that when I could be doing other work, instead starting it before bed or a meal. My system was pegged to the point that it was slow and barely responsive while I was trying to do other things during the conversion process (not something I have experienced before with this machine). I converted 526 RAF files to DNG using the Iridient X-Transformer, and it completely pegged my CPU to 100% for the duration of the conversion process, which was about 25-30 minutes. My point here is not to brag, but to point out that my the system I am testing this on is not underpowered at all. I have an enthusiast grade CPU, the Intel I7 5820K, which runs 6 cores and 12 threads (the software sees 12 cores, not 6) that runs at 3.6Ghz, but I have mine overclocked to 4.3Ghz. But I wanted to share my experiences with it today and talk a bit about how I have worked it into my workflow to allow me to continue to use Lightroom.įirst off, this software chews up your CPU, no way around it. It is not perfect, but I would not expect it to be issue free, it is a beta release after all. The software is currently in Beta, and I recently downloaded it and have been playing around with it. Which you can then use in Lightroom just as you would a RAW RAF file, with the benefit of not having the sharpness issues that an RAF file imported into Lightroom would have. How – you might ask? Iridient X-Transformer, an RAF to DNG converter that utilizes the Iridient Developer engine to convert your RAF files into Adobe DNG files. But what if I told you that there is now a way for Windows users to get the benefits of Iridient Developer while continuing to use lightroom? Iridient Developer is one of those alternatives that is known to handle Fujifilm X-Trans files better, at least in regards to sharpness. Yet still, many continue to use Lightroom not out of some loyalty, but simply because learning a new processor is a pain in the rear end and most of us don’t have time for that. Adobe has made strides in their X-Trans support, but one key area that continues to frustrate Fuji-X shooters is the sharpness or lack thereof in the Lightroom files. It is just simple, easy and intuitive, but as we all know with Fujifilm X-Trans files it has some flaws. It's almost a sport to denigrate Adobe, but you can get really good results using LR and PS with Fuji RAW files.Love it or Hate it, Adobe Lightroom is one of the most popular image processing and management solutions for a reason. I work in LR and then send to PS if I have additional editing needs. Applying at import gives a great starting point, and you can then concentrate on other LR basic and more advanced settings, again, if you want. You can always make changes after import, if you want. If you do, set up Lightroom to apply these settings along with Remove Chromatic Aberration and your desired film simulation on import. Try and my settings, and see if you like what you see. My images are very clean without some of the over-sharpening artifacts, which can make Fuji RAF files and others a bit weird. I found these settings (recommended online by a Fuji photog who did quite a bit of trials) to be excellent. We both use radius of 1.0, but I use Amount= 60 and Detail = 5. ![]() I use detail settings very different from and am quite pleased with my results. This applies to Lightroom as I do not sharpen or really do anything in Bridge. I like Iridient X-transformer for files with a lot of detail, but I've found this LR/PS only workflow to work for much of what I do. You still have to sharpen to taste with "amount" and "radius" but it's a different approach. The X-trans exhibits its own behavior under that paradigm and the "detail=100" helps mitigate that. It's not unusual for smaller sensor cameras to illustrate sharpening artifacts under strong settings, and they get "stronger" as the ISO of the file increases. ![]() I follow him and use his work and several of his presets. Thomas Fitzgerald has written a lot about how to integrate Iridient X-transformer into an Adobe workflow. ![]() This is almost an inversion of how you treat in a scalar world a non-X-trans file. The short of it is with X-trans files you should slide the "detail slider" to 100%, set radius about 1 and "amount to ~40. There has been a huge amount written about this and it's much too painful to rehash in a single post. Do a web search on Fuji X-trans files with Adobe Lightroom/Photoshop.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |